Physics · Investigate

Read an invented friction comparison

Which variables need controlling before a surface comparison is useful?

Read a completely invented steady-pull table, calculate its averages and identify what a real comparison would need to hold consistent.

15–25 minutes, or one table row for a first try. More time is optional.

A labelled table gives fictional force readings in newtons: surface A has 2, 2, 2 with mean 2; surface B has 4, 4, 4 with mean 4. A note states same block, level surface and steady speed.
Fictional steady-pull records. Open full-size diagram ↗

Start here

Copy this invented record in newtons (N): surface A, 2, 2, 2; surface B, 4, 4, 4. The model uses the same sliding block at steady speed on a level surface.

Use your idea or the example below. Talk, write, draw, point or listen first. You can stop after one step.

Try it your way.

  1. State the model conditions

    Assume the same block, contact face, added load, level track and steady speed for both surface labels. Each entry represents the horizontal pull needed to balance sliding friction in this simplified model.

  2. Read and calculate

    There are three fictional entries per surface. A averages (2 + 2 + 2) ÷ 3 = 2 N. B averages (4 + 4 + 4) ÷ 3 = 4 N. Keep the unit beside each result.

  3. Make a bounded comparison

    In this table, B needs 2 N more pull and twice A’s average pull. These labels do not identify real materials. The table does not establish that a rough-looking surface always has a larger friction force.

  4. Identify missing evidence

    Name one condition that would need checking in a real investigation, such as a consistent load or speed. Do not turn invented entries into actual observations. You can finish by annotating the supplied table.

One possible version

Fictional steady-pull records

All six numbers were invented to practise reading a controlled comparison. Horizon did not perform a friction experiment.

  • Surface A: 2, 2, 2 N; mean = 2 N. Surface B: 4, 4, 4 N; mean = 4 N.
  • Difference of the means: 4 − 2 = 2 N. Ratio: 4 ÷ 2 = 2.
  • At the assumed steady speed, the forward pull and backward sliding-friction force balance. Equal opposite forces do not mean the block is stationary.

This model does not measure a coefficient of friction, test named materials or establish measurement precision. Real records can vary; constant invented numbers are not evidence of perfect measurement.

A different way.

Read one row aloud, point to the larger mean or have someone scribe your explanation. Use only the invented records; no practical test is needed.

If you want more.

Try another explicitly invented table: A: 1, 3, 2 N and B: 3, 5, 4 N. Both means remain 2 and 4 N, but each set now has a range of 2 N. Explain how a mean can hide variation.

Something to keep?

Am I describing what the invented records say, or claiming an experiment happened?

You can keep a question, a sketch or a change of mind. A finished product is optional.

This opens an editable starter in your project tools. It asks before replacing open work. Choosing it does not save or share your work automatically.